The notion of the ‘
discursive complex’ was developed by
Ian Parker to tackle the twofold nature of
psychoanalysis in
Western culture. In his 1997 book Psychoanalytic Culture, Parker defines the ‘discursive complex’ as a ‘methodological device. The term ‘complex’ is used quite deliberately to evoke the peculiarly
Freudian and post-Freudian nature of the subjectivity people in the West live so much of the time. On the one hand the concepts that psychoanalytic texts employ are relayed through
culture as components of a discourse, as objects that are circumscribed by definitions in
academic and
professional writing and used in
advertising (Parker, 1995). In this sense, the discourse constitutes places for subjects to come to be, whether as a child with problems separating from the mother, as a teenager filled with frustration and resentment at authority, or as an older adult reflecting on an unfulfilled life and needs. The discourse thus positions the subject who is addressed by or who is employing the discourse to understand themselves or their troubling relationships. On the other hand, the discourse touches an already existing shape of subjectivity for those who write and speak about themselves and others, whether that is in the form of autobiography or in an advice column, in a television interview or on the couch with a therapist. It chimes with a theory of self that the subject has been invited to elaborate for themselves in this culture, and so it reconfigures each time some of the
emotions that are available to them.