<onlyinclude>
Scholarly peer review (also known as
refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author's
scholarly work, research, or
ideas to the scrutiny of others who are
experts in the same field, before a paper describing this work is published in a journal or as a book. The peer review helps the publisher (that is, the
editor-in-chief or the
editorial board) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected. Peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) field, who are qualified and able to perform reasonably impartial review. Impartial review, especially of work in less narrowly defined or inter-disciplinary fields, may be difficult to accomplish, and the significance (good or bad) of an idea may never be widely appreciated among its contemporaries. Peer review is generally considered necessary to academic quality and is used in most major scientific journals, but does by no means prevent publication of all invalid research. Traditionally, peer reviewers have been anonymous, but there is currently a significant amount of
open peer review, where the comments are visible to readers, generally with the identities of the peer reviewers disclosed as well.</onlyinclude>